Interim verdict in Waqf and my opinion.

(MUMBAI)Dt-15 Reportar-Gorakh More-“Prawasi Sanchar”Online Digital Media

There are many examples from agricultural laws to the Waqf law that the general public no longer believes that the government makes laws for the good of all of us, for our development.The court used the principle of assuming that a law passed by the government through Parliament is constitutional and refused to strike down the entire law.If the purpose of making a law is not pure, the Supreme Court actually has the power to strike down such a law,but it seems that the court has avoided using that judicial rigor.if the decision to have a maximum of 4 non-Muslim members out of 22 in the Central Waqf Board and three non-Muslim members in the 11-member board is to be considered correct,then the same principle of all-religious equality and all-religious participation should be seen in the various religious place committees of Hindu,Christian, Sikh, Buddhist,Jain religions. Since this is not the case.

the Supreme Court was required to completely suspend these provisions.The District Magistrate already has so many responsibilities, so it is good that they have been given the power to investigate Waqf properties.Since there is no mechanism to determine whether someone has been following Islam for five years if they want to take over a Waqf, this decision will encourage controversy in the law.Allowing divisive laws means preparing to remove constitutional values like justice, brotherhood,equality. It would be wrong to incite and create religious fanaticism through the law.While saying this, it must be mentioned that corruption in the name of the Waqf Board or committees of other religions should be fought against, but the fight should not be against the corrupt but against a religion.